New wage-model at VW, Germany
From wildcat no. 71, autumn 2004
In search of 5000 talented workers to build automobiles
In
November 1999, Volkswagen labor director Hartz presented the new
project called “5000 x 5000“ to the public. 5000 working spaces would
be established to produce the new Volkswagen “Touran“ model in
Wolfsburg (Germany) and Hannover (Germany). The goal would be to bring
“work places from abroad“ back to Germany. The project wanted to show
that even under German (high-wage) conditions it would be possible to
create profitable production.
The basic idea of the project was to
produce a number of pieces for a fixed wage of 5000 DM (2556 Euro).
Furthermore, there were no surcharge payments allotted for overtime,
nightshifts or weekend-work, and no Christmas or summer bonuses and no
overtime compensation through time off. Working hours were rolling time
from 28.8 to 48 hours per week with Saturday as a normal workday. It
was a list of wishes.
The wishes were not in agreement with
Volkswagen contract with the Volkswagen Workers Union, so Volkswagen
founded a subsidiary company, the Auto 5000 GmbH. At the end of March
2001, Volkswagen started negotiations with IG Metall. In principle, the
IG Metall welcomed the concept, but there were some corrections
necessary concerning working hours and wages. On July 28, 2001, a
collective Auto 5000 agreement, with a duration of three years, was
concluded about the conditions of the production of the Touran in
Wolfsburg. The results were: 3500 unemployed workers would be hired.
They would go through a special application procedure; the application
would be processed solely by the Auto 5000 job center. The selected
applicant would have to complete a three-month qualification period
(paid by the job center), in which they should achieve general
suitability for industry. After that, the applicant would have a
six-month probation period including: training, more qualification, and
building of the efficiency necessary for the demanded quota of the
number of pieces. They would get unemployment money and later in the
plant, they would get fixed wages of 2045 Euro per month. After
completing probation successfully, they would get unlimited employment
with a monthly wage of 2300 Euro plus a minimum bonus of 256 Euro,
before tax naturally, and an additional personal achievement bonus and
a plant-wide production bonus. All of the additional payments would
depend on achieving the demanded profit margin. In comparison with the
agreement between Volkswagen and its employees in the VW Wolfsburg
plant, Auto 5000 employees would earn 20-40 per cent less.
The Auto
5000 contract “stipulates value creating regular working hours“ as 35
hours a week on average per year. They can be expanded to 42 hours a
week if necessary. Up to 200 hours can be collected on an overtime
account.
Compensation is made through time off or payment with 25
per cent added. The early and late shifts on Saturdays and the start up
shifts on Sunday evening count as regular working time. Paid overtime
can really only be created by management mistakes. If the number of
pieces of the necessary quality is not achieved, it is necessary to do
unpaid rework. The responsibility of defects lies with the “team“ that
produced them. Weekly, employees have to do three hours of
qualification, 1 1/2 hours of which are paid. During the first two
years of the contract there is a mutual cancellation period, after that
the legal requirements are valid.
There are various additional
agreements within the collective Auto 5000 agreement, which “set the
form of the working organization“. It is full of demand formulations
about how “to create human working organizations“, “varied and holistic
working matters“, “flat hierarchy“, and “semi-autonomous teams“ with
“advanced options, dispositions and spaces for decisions“. In an
appendix about achievement- an employee rating appears to be based on
the criteria of the “biological and social reasonability“ of the
personal setting.
Additionally, there is a “collective agreement
about qualification“: After two years of “continued qualification“, all
of the employees of the “Learning Factory“ become “accredited
Professionals for Automobile Production“. With a contract for
“co-management“, the workers council is allowed to determine the goals
of production, personnel numbers and bonuses.
The glorification of
the Auto 5000 location and the agreements about “holistic working
organization“ and “co-management“ produced a storm of ardor in almost
all of the media. Even critical unionistpraised the project. IG Metall
celebrated this “innovative model“ in general and the maintenance of
the 35 hour week in particular, certainly after the “dramatic
negotiations“, as a “remarkable signal for the labor market“.They even
noted as an achievement that all successful employees were to be
employed after their probation period.
The production of the Touran
started in January 2003 (after a delay). By the end of 2004, it should
have been completely functioning. Out of 43,000 applicants, 3,780 were
chosen for the phase of qualification and finally roughly 3,000 were
hired. Almost 90 percent were unemployed before and were better
qualified than average. Half of them were from Western Germany and half
from Eastern Germany. The composition of the workforce in view of age
and gender was typical for automobile production. The average age of
Auto 5000 personnel was 32 years old. 149 of the employees in the
probation period were not later employed or signed off by themselves.
However,
the start up phase could not have flown smoothly. Auto 5000 management
needed to integrate “supporters“, workers with Volkswagen-experience,
into the Auto 5000 project. All in all, 107 people were added, mostly
for the lower management. Now there are four hierarchies: management,
leader of the assembly section, engineers and “supporters“.
Obviously,
there were clashes with self-confident workers. A social science study
paid by Volkswagen and IG Metall reflected what was easy to hear, “They
think they can do what they want with us former unemployed.“The study
captures those experiences on tiptoes stating, The “raised social
sensibility of the unemployed“ and the “demand of self-responsible
action“ created a “particularly critical sounding board“ for however
inevitable conflicts. “The still highly motivated crew gives, just like
the representatives of the concept in management and in workers council
do, reason for good chances to hold the project on a successful track
and contribute to a renaissance of even, enhanced industrial production
work in Germany.“ (SOFI Göttingen: interim report about the project
5000x5000)
[prol-position news #1, 3/2005]

